Change
The
Philippines. The Philippines is a third-world country with a population of 110
million as of 2022. With a population of 110 million, does each individual's
rights violated get addressed? A simple answer would be no. Rights in the
Philippines can be seen being violated everywhere, with little to no measures
to address the issue. Rights such as Article 3, "Everyone has the right to
life, liberty, and security of person." Article 5, "No one shall be
subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or
punishment." Last is article 19, "Everyone has the right to freedom
of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without
interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any
media and regardless of frontiers." These are a few rights seen violated
in a prevalent manner.
Now,
why do rights in the Philippines prevalently get violated, and why does
redressing them seem to be difficult? An appropriate answer for this would be
an example that explains how the Government in the Philippines works. In the
past, human rights defenders sought the 100 percent prosecution and conviction
of human rights violators in the Philippines, specifically during the term of
Duterte and its war on drugs.
Nonetheless,
Karapatan Secretary General Cristina "Tinay" Palabay stated that this
is "wishful thinking," especially since liability was never present
in the killings in the country's war on drugs. Later on, during an
investigative Philippine media event, Palabay stated that efforts are already
being made to look further into the killings. She also stated, "However,
these are hitting one dead end after another." "We need results,
actual results," she stressed. "Those who are killing on the ground
should stop what they are doing." Despite that, Palabay gave thanks to the
International Criminal Court (ICC) for citing the human rights violations
happening in the country. Last December 15, 2020, ICC prosecutor Fatou Bensouda
released a report revealing a basis behind the claims that murder, torture, and
crimes against humanity occurred during Duterte's first three years. Bensouda
reported that "The Office is satisfied that information available provides
a reasonable basis to believe that the crimes against humanity of murder
(Article 7(1)(a)), torture (article 7(1)(f)), and the infliction of serious
physical injury and mental harm as other inhumane Acts (Article 7(1)(k)) were
committed on the territory of the Philippines. Between at least July 1, 2016,
and March 16, 2019, in connection to the War on Drugs campaign launched
throughout the country."
Although
the report was convincing, the Government officials of the Philippines still
refuted the statement, with our previous president, Duterte himself, saying
that ICC prosecutors do not read. The previous Senate president, Vicente Sotto
III, also dismissed the report. Sotto then stated facts from law enforcement
agencies such as the PNP and PDEA to counter Bensouda's initial findings. After
stating figures from law enforcement agencies, he then asked, "Ano
pinagsasabi nitong si Bensouda na reasonable
basis of crimes against humanity?" "That is what she believes,"
Sotto stated of Bensouda's statements. Despite all of this, Palabay is still
hopeful that the report will stimulate action for accountability, even stating,
"This can make an impact even after this government finishes this
term." Having all said this, it is clear why redressing human rights in
the Philippines seems hopeless. The Government itself shuts down anything that
may cause their actions to harm to prevent their ways from being halted. We can
only hope that change will come sooner or later, and that the current
Government will be different.
No comments:
Post a Comment